Wearever print full-leg pants

The modern leg shape you love in a new print. Elastic waist. 31" inseam, 29" petite. Rayon and Lycra® spandex. Machine wash. Imported.

VF055E

$39.99 was ~~$84.00~~

Color:

Size:

Price:

Quantity:

add a gift box

we also suggest

Rated 4.8 out of 5 by 9 reviewers.

Rated 4 out of 5 by NKB63 Very comfy but runs large These are cute but cut a little large around the middle. I had to send back and order a size down. Smaller size worked great. May 11, 2013

Rated 5 out of 5 by kao9011 Light and "flowy" Material is very light and "flowy." I love it! I had to shorten the hem, but it's ok. I wear March 29, 2013

Rated 4 out of 5 by Penny29 Pants to move! an easy-wear all year pants choice to dress up or down. Excellent for travel. March 13, 2013

Rated 5 out of 5 by MimiDR Dress Them Up - Dress Them Down - Still the Perfect Pant Love the pants! Very comfortable. Dressy when they need to be. Casual when you want them to be. Nice fit and no bulky placket in the front to spoil your side view. J. Jill never disappoints! February 26, 2013

Rated 5 out of 5 by Hisdaughter I love all wearever items! These pants are comfortable and nice looking. They have a nice fluid look. Wearever are great products to wear to work and I love how easy they are to clean. Thanks Jjill for another great product! February 23, 2013

Rated 5 out of 5 by PAGALPAL PRETTIER THAN I IMAGINED I fell in love with these pants the minute I saw them in the catalog and I certainly didn't change my mind when I saw them in person. I ordered the XL (I usually wear a 1X or a 2X depending on the manufacturer).so they obviously run slightly large. The pants fall beautifully and my daughter said they are very flattering. I agree! I couldn't be happier and would recommend these for comfort and style. February 21, 2013

Rated 5 out of 5 by Graciela Change of Pace These slacks are a nice change of pace in the Wearever travel knit line from JJill. Good fit, roomy which is great when traveling and nice enough to wear to the office. February 21, 2013

Rated 5 out of 5 by Baystater Classy look! These pants are gorgeous and pair well with a black top and silver jewelry. I'm 5'3" usually a size 12 and the petite mediums fit perfectly. A nice rich look and oh so comfortable. Love seeing Wearever offered now in prints. February 12, 2013

2 next>>

questions and answers

Ask your questions. Share your answers.

(1 Question : 5 Answers)

Ask a new question

« Back

Search Q&A

All

Has staff answer

5 answers

hem length on Wearever print full leg pants

The inseam of 31 inches is not long enough for me. I need a minimum of 33 inch inseam.

Since you don't sell a tall size for this item, I'm wondering if the pant leg has a sufficient hem that I may be able to take out the hem and lengthen the pant leg. Can you tell me if this pant has a 2 inch hem?

Thanks. Linda

Topic:Fit

Body Type: Tall

Feb 7, 2013 by

lindahut

Answer this question

0points

0out of 0found this question helpful.

Was this helpful?helpful0unhelpful0

Report inappropriate content

Answers

Staff

This is Sara from J. Jill. Thank you for your question!

The Wearever Print Full-Leg Pants have a ½“ hem.

Feb 7, 2013 by

JJillSaraB

Tilton, NH, USA

+1point

1out of 1found this answer helpful.

Was this helpful?helpful1unhelpful0

Report inappropriate content

Top 50 contributor

It is a very loose fitting pant that hangs. I am 5' 11' and most the height is in my legs. I wouldn't normally want a 30" inseam either. I bought an XL and I am on the high end of that size. Standing barefoot, the pants cover my ankles and the top of my feet about 2" past the ankle. This is the area where a loafer or lace-up type shoe would end on the top of your foot. It is actually pretty close to where it falls in the picture of the model with the long sleeved black top.

The pant leg is so full that I am not sure if I would like it much longer. I prefer a 32" or 33" inseam on more fitted pants but these seem okay to me. I am not sure if the smaller sizes will hang this way.

Age: 55-65

Body Type: Tall

Feb 8, 2013 by

kaneonapua

Springfield, MA, USA

+1point

1out of 1found this answer helpful.

Was this helpful?helpful1unhelpful0

Report inappropriate content

Top 100 contributor

Linda, don't believe this will accommodate your needs.

Age: 55-65

Body Type: Full-figured

Feb 8, 2013 by

mimi4

Plymouth, MA, USA

+1point

1out of 1found this answer helpful.

Was this helpful?helpful1unhelpful0

Report inappropriate content

Top 500 contributor

The hem is VERY tiny so there is no way that they could be lengthened that I can see - certainly not by 2 inches.

Age: Over 65

Body Type: Full-figured

Feb 21, 2013 by

PAGALPAL

0points

0out of 0found this answer helpful.

Was this helpful?helpful0unhelpful0

Report inappropriate content

Top 250 contributor

I am 5'6" and take a petite in these slacks. There is about half a inch of "hem" in these pants, machine finished.If you live near a JJill store, I would go in to try on a pair for fit. I usually take a regular, not petite size. But the length on the regular was very generous. As someone who has designed clothes, I would not attempt to hem these pants.

Age: 55-65

Body Type: Curvy

Feb 21, 2013 by

Graciela

Eastern PA

+1point

1out of 1found this answer helpful.

Was this helpful?helpful1unhelpful0

Report inappropriate content

1 of 1

Policies & Guidelines

Ask a new question